<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Humanitarian Military Journal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Humanitarian Military Journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Гуманитарный военный журнал</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-7246</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">703674</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/hmj703674</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">VCXBHN</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MILITARY PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL TRAINING</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Военная педагогика и профессиональное образование</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Methods providing the evidence-based approach to and logical integrity of dissertations in professional education system</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Методологические основания обеспечения доказательности и логической целостности диссертационного исследования в системе профессионального образования</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5615-8835</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4685-1472</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Islamov</surname><given-names>Vladimir A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Исламов</surname><given-names>Владимир Александрович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dr. Sci. (Pedagogy), Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р пед. наук, профессор</p></bio><email>isvdv@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3767-6012</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4548-9446</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Obraztsov</surname><given-names>Mikhail S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Образцов</surname><given-names>Михаил Сергеевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. пед. наук</p></bio><email>mikhailvifk@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Kirov Military Medical Academy</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Военно-медицинская академия им. С.М. Кирова</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-03-03"><day>03</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-03-05"><day>05</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2026, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2026, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://manmiljournal.ru/hmj/article/view/703674">https://manmiljournal.ru/hmj/article/view/703674</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper examines the methods providing the evidence-based approach to and logical integrity of dissertations in the professional education system. The theoretical and methodological approach is based on the criteria of an evidence-based dissertation in the field of education approved by the Russian Academy of Education and the Presidium of the State Commission for Academic Degrees and Titles of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia in 2023 and the national standard of the structure of the dissertation and abstract (GOST R 7.0.11-2011). It was found that the evidence base in pedagogical research is determined by the correct methods, the sufficient empirical base, and the methodological consistency of topic–problem/task–object–subject–goal–tasks–hypothesis–novelty–provisions submitted for defense–conclusion sections. Based on an analysis of common methodological errors identified by local researchers (Zagvyazinsky, Meretukova, and others) and the principle of alignment (consistency of research questions, design, and methods), the authors propose an algorithm for expert verification of evidence, including 16 steps grouped into five verification sections. The algorithm is presented as a flowchart and is designed for the practice-oriented research in professional education, where reproducibility, implementation of findings, and their correlation with regulations (federal state educational standards, professional standards, and employer requirements) are of particular importance.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье рассмотрены методологические основания, обеспечивающие доказательность и логическую целостность диссертационного исследования в системе профессионального образования. Теоретико-методологической базой выступают критерии доказательности диссертационных исследований в сфере наук об образовании, утверждённые Российской академией образования и Президиумом Высшей аттестационной комиссии при Минобрнауки России в 2023 г., а также требования национального стандарта ГОСТ Р 7.0.11–2011 к структуре диссертации и автореферата. Установлено, что доказательность в педагогическом исследовании определяется не только корректностью методов и достаточностью эмпирической базы, но и сквозной согласованностью методологического аппарата: тема — проблема/задача — объект — предмет — цель — задачи — гипотеза — научная новизна — положения, выносимые на защиту — выводы. С опорой на анализ типичных методологических ошибок, выделяемых в отечественной научной традиции (В.И. Загвязинский, З.К. Меретукова и др.), и на зарубежный принцип alignment (согласованности исследовательских вопросов, дизайна и методов) предложен алгоритм экспертной верификации доказательности, включающий 16 шагов, сгруппированных в пять проверочных блоков. Алгоритм представлен в виде блок-схемы и рассчитан на практико-ориентированный характер исследований в профессиональном образовании, где особое значение имеют воспроизводимость, внедряемость результатов и их соотнесение с нормативными основаниями (федеральные государственные образовательные стандарты, профессиональные стандарты, требования работодателей).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>evidence</kwd><kwd>logical integrity</kwd><kwd>methodologies</kwd><kwd>dissertation</kwd><kwd>professional education</kwd><kwd>criteria of the Russian Academy of Education and the State Commission for Academic Degrees and Titles</kwd><kwd>verification algorithm</kwd><kwd>conformity matrix</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>доказательность</kwd><kwd>логическая целостность</kwd><kwd>методологический аппарат</kwd><kwd>диссертация</kwd><kwd>профессиональное образование</kwd><kwd>критерии Российской академии образования и Высшей аттестационной комиссии</kwd><kwd>алгоритм верификации</kwd><kwd>матрица соответствия</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Kryukov EV, Islamov VA. Military conflicts as a driver of scientific research: pedagogy, psychology, medicine, rehabilitation. Humanitarian Military Journal. 2025;1(1):5–10. doi: 10.17816/hmj654001 EDN: GFRGIT</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Ivanova SV, Podufalov ND, Serikov VV, et al. Application of evidence criteria for dissertation research in the field of education sciences: methodological guidelines. Moscow: Russian Academy of Education; 2023. 22 p. ISBN: 978-5-6048497-7-4 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Pereslavtseva LI. On evidence in pedagogical dissertation research. Scientific Notes. Electronic Scientific Journal of Kursk State University. 2023;4(68):101–107. EDN: XNXCCQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Zharkov AD. On the criteria for improving the quality of dissertation research on pedagogy developed by RAO. World of Science, Culture and Education. 2024;1(104):153–155. doi: 10.24412/1991-5497-2024-1104-153-155 EDN: DTSINH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Zakirova AF. Errors in hypothesis as a methodological reflection subject of a teacher-researcher. Education and Science. 2021;23(6):11–42. doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-11-42 EDN: USCCWI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Dneprov SA. V.I. Zagvyazinsky and R.A. Atakhanov's textbook "Methodology and methods of psychological and pedagogical research" in the self-development of pedagogical science and education. Education and Self-Development. 2012;3(31):205–210. (In Russ.) EDN: PFCSLX</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Meretukova ZK. Methodological errors in psychological and pedagogical research and publications. Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. 2006;(2):147–151. (In Russ.) EDN: JZGAPJ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (book review). Nurse Researcher. 2004;12(1):82–83. doi: 10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ. A practical guide to writing quantitative and qualitative research questions and hypotheses in scholarly articles. J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37(16):e121. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e121 EDN: BWYSGO</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Dorozhkin EM, Zeer EF. Methodology of professional pedagogical education: theory and practice (theoretical and methodological foundations of vocational teacher education). Education and Science. 2014;(9(118)):4–20. EDN: TAIVCT</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Gubanov NI, Gubanov NN, Tretyakov NG. Criteria some aspects of scientific knowledge. Bulletin of the North-Eastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Philosophy. 2016;1(01):25–35. EDN: WLSQRP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Efimova SA. Problems of competency-based assessment of applied qualifications. Education and Science. 2017;19(5):120–137. doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2017-5-120-137 EDN: YPSQFB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Suslova IB. Selection of the topic, setting the goals and objectives of research when writing scientific work at the university. Bulletin of the University of Russian Innovative Education. 2023;(1-1):73–80. doi: 10.24412/2949-4524-2023-1-73-80 EDN: JHPPJQ</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
