Marxism and the objectivity of man: the relevance of Ilyenkov’s ideas about man and consciousness
- Authors: Korsakov S.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Philosophy RAS
- Issue: Vol 36, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 7-22
- Section: The philosophy of the himan being
- URL: https://manmiljournal.ru/0236-2007/article/view/684252
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0236200725010011
- ID: 684252
Cite item
Abstract
The article was written in connection with the centenary of the outstanding Soviet philosopher Evald Vasilyevich Ilyenkov (1924–1979). It talks about the significance of Ilyenkov’s ideas in the history of philosophy, about his place within the framework of Marxist philosophy, the authentic form of which was developed in the Soviet Union by the school of dialectics, and then by the school of Ilyenkov. The main attention is paid to Ilyenkov’s ideas about man and consciousness. The idea of combining dialectical logic with human philosophy (philosophical anthropology) is proposed as promising. The role of the category “object” and the method of dividing the whole in the knowledge of a person and his individuality is emphasized. It is concluded that Ilyenkov revealed the well-known Marxian definition of the essence of man in accordance with the instructions of Marx himself as a concrete-universal concept that allows us to lay a philosophical foundation for the understanding of man as an active creative individuality. Ilyenkov’s ideas about consciousness are considered, and the prospects of the procedural understanding of consciousness and the approach to it as a double relationship to an object are discussed - an attitude to a relationship, a constantly renewed dimension of objective activity. Applied consequences from Ilyenkov’s interpretation of man and consciousness are noted. They relate, firstly, to Ilyenkov’s criticism of the constructivist style of thinking, which he designated by the term “positivist,” and which, despite the terminological appearance created, displaces science as knowledge of the laws of nature. Secondly, Ilyenkoym’s criticism of technocratic conceit, which, promising man a “consumer paradise” with the help of electronic civilization, naturally transformed into transhumanism, returning man from the freedom of social creativity to the order of biological evolution of species.
About the authors
Sergey N. Korsakov
Institute of Philosophy RAS
Author for correspondence.
Email: snkorsakov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5272-9675
DSc in Philosophy, Leading Research Fellow
Russian Federation, 12/1 Goncharnaya Str., Moscow 109240References
- Беседин А.П., Волков Д.Б., Кузнецов А.В., Логинов Е.В., Мерцалов А.В. Интроспекция: современные подходы и проблемы // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2021. № 2. С. 195–215. // Besedin A.P., Volkov D.B., Kuznetsov A.V., Loginov E.V., Mertsalov A.V. Introspektsiya: sovremennyye podkhody i problemy [Introspection: modern Approaches and Problems]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2021. N 2. P. 195–215.
- Витгенштейн Л. Заметки о философии психологии. М.: Дом интеллектуальной книги, 2001. // Wittgenstein L. Zametki o filosofii psikhologii [Notes on the Philosophy of Psychology]. Moscow: Dom intellektual’noy knigi Publ., 2001.
- Выготский Л.С. Собрание сочинений. Т. 1. М.: Педагогика, 1982. // Vygotsky L.S. Sobraniye sochineniy [Collected Works]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., 1982.
- Гегель Г.В.Ф. Работы разных лет. М.: Мысль, 1970. Т. 1. // Hegel G.V.F. Raboty raznykh let [Works from Different Years]. Moscow: Mysl Publ., 1970. Vol. 1.
- Дубровский Д.И. Информация, сознание, мозг. М.: Высшая школа, 1980. // Dubrovsky D.I. Informatsiya, soznaniye, mozg [Information, Consciousness, Brain]. Moscow: Vysshayashkola Publ., 1980.
- Дубровский Д.И. К вопросу о глобальном будущем и трансгуманистической эволюции // Вопросы философии. № 3. 2015. С. 214–220. // Dubrovsky D.I. K voprosu o global’nom budushchem i transgumanisticheskoy evolyutsii [On the Question of the Global Future and Transhumanistic Еvolution]. Voprosy filosofii. N 3. 2015. P. 214–220.
- Ильенков Э.В. Об идолах и идеалах. М.: Политиздат, 1968. // Ilyenkov E.V. Ob idolakh i idealakh [About Idols and Ideals]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 1968.
- Ильенков Э.В. Философия и культура. М.: Политиздат, 1991. // Ilyenkov E.V. Filosofiya i kul’tura [Philosophy and Culture]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 1991.
- Корсаков С.Н. Рец. на кн.: Страсти по тезисам о предмете философии (1954–1955) / авт.-сост. Е.Э. Иллеш. М.:Канон+, РООИ Реабилитация, 2016. // Человек. 2016. № 6. С. 173–177. // Korsakov S.N. Rets. na kn.: Strastipotezisam o predmetefilosofii (1954–1955) / Avt.-sost. Ye.E. Illesh. M.: Izdatel’stvo «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2016. [Rec. on the book: Passions on theses on the subject of philosophy (1954–1955) / аuthor-ed. E.E. Illesh. Moscow: Publishing house Canon+, ROOI Rehabilitation Publ., 2016.] Chelovek. 2016. N 6. P. 173–177.
- Леонтьев А.Н. Деятельность и сознание // Вопросы философии. 1972. № 12. С. 129–140. // Leontyev A.N. Deyatel’nost’ i soznaniye [Activity and consciousness]. Voprosy filosofii. 1972. N 12. P. 129–140.
- Михайлов Ф.Т. Опять о нем и про него… // Образ Эвальда Ильенкова в воспоминаниях. М.: Русская панорама, 2024. // Mikhailov F.T. Opyat’ o nem i pro nego… [Again about Him and about Him...]. Obraz Eval’da Il’yenkova v vospominaniyakh [The Image of Evald Ilyenkov in Мemoirs]. Moscow: Russkaya panorama Publ., 2024.
- Пущаев Ю.В. Загадка последней книги Ильенкова: почему именно А.А. Богданов оказался его итоговым оппонентом // Вопросы философии. 2024. № 3. С. 29–40. // Pushchaev Yu.V. Zagadka posledney knigiI l’yenkova: pochemu imenno A.A. Bogdanov okazalsyay ego itogovym opponentom [The Mystery of Ilyenkov’s Last Book: why Exactly A.A. Bogdanov Turned out to be his Final Opponent]. Voprosy filosofii. 2024. N 3. P. 29–40.
- Розин В.М. От принципа объективности научного знания к реконструкции разных ситуаций производства знания // Идеи и идеалы. 2022. № 3. Ч. 1. С. 75–92. // Rozin V.M. Ot printsipa ob”yektivnosti nauchnogo znaniya k rekonstruktsii raznykh situatsiy proizvodstva znaniya [From the Principle of Objectivity of Scientific Knowledge to the Reconstruction of Different Situations of Knowledge Production]. Idei i idealy. 2022. N 3. Part 1. P. 75–92.
- Щедровицкий Г.П. Оргуправленческое мышление: идеология, методология, технология: курс лекций. М.: Путь, 2000. (Из архива Г.П. Щедровицкого. Т. 4). // Shchedrovitsky G.P. Orgupravlencheskoye myshleniye: ideologiya, metodologiya, tekhnologiya: kurslektsiy [Organizational Thinking: Ideology, Methodology, Technology: a Course of Lectures]. Moscow: Put Publ., 2000. (From the archive of G.P. Shchedrovitsky T. 4).
Supplementary files
